The Issue with Czar's Helmet

Could or couldn't the Czars read Arabic? Why then was the Armour of Russian warlords of XIV-XVI centuries all covered with Arabic inscriptions from the Quran they could not possibly read? Or could they? Russian Czars Alexander Nevsky and Ivan the Terrible wore helmets with Arabic inscriptions. Were the thousands of helmets, swords, sabers, shields, armor with Arabic inscriptions kept in Armoury of Kremlin the rich spoils of war with Arabs, Turks, or the souvenirs of their ambassadors to Russian Czars? No, they are neither the spoils of war of victorious Russian Horde troops nor the presents from subjugated kingdoms and princes. They were all made in Russia by Russian craftsmen of the XIV-XVII centuries. According to Dr. Fomenko et al., Russia was in XIII-XVI a trilingual state with Russian, Arabic, and Turkic as three official languages.
Letters considered Arabic nowadays were used for transcribing Russian words. Russia, Europe, Turkey, and Persia had been part of the same Great = "Mongolian" Empire in XIII - XVI until the very end of the XVII century when it disintegrated during the Great Strife. Who and Why invented Antiquity and Dark Ages and deleted the Empire that span over Eurasia? The consensual world history was manufactured in Europe in XVI-XIX centuries with the political agenda of powers of that period based on erroneous chronology elaborated by kabbalist Joseph Justus Scaliger and Jesuit Dionys Petavius. By the middle of the XVI century, the prime political agenda of Europe that reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily to the Evil Empire of Eurasia, was to free Europe. The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists in XV-XVII centuries in creating and disseminating fictional Ancient World served this agenda. The fictional Ancient World was created by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before, according to the ancient sources they invented. The European aristocracy, a considerable part of which were fugitives from Byzantine and/or the inheritors of Eurasian warlords, supported the myth of the Ancient World to justify its claims to countries they ruled. The black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants developed and supported the myth of the Ancient World to justify their claims of being more ancient and to separate themselves from Eurasian orthodoxy in the countries ruled by the European aristocracy. The scientists supported the myth of the Ancient World as a safe cover for their heretic research that produced results contrarian to the tenets of Christianity. They justified their discoveries by authorities of ancient scientists they invented and used as pseudonyms. The humanists developed and supported the myth of the Ancient World as a cozy safe haven for their ideas that conflicted with Christianity and aristocracy. They disguised and justified their ideas on authorities of ancient authors of their own making and wrote under their glorious aliases. Saint Augustin, being prescient, said "..beware of mathematicians, especially when they speak the truth " https: //evilempireblog.wordpress.com/