Fact Crashing(TM) Methodology

Written by Dan Regard, Founder and CEO at iDS, Fact Crashing(TM) Methodology covers the 9 Principles of the Fact Crashing(TM), along with the necessary tools needed to help change the way we litigate. Fact Crashing(TM) is a portmanteau, a new word made from two pre-existing words. Fact being any digital truth recorded by the systems that permeate our digital lives, and crashing, a construction project management concept used to describe the acceleration of one phase of a project to the benefit of the entire project. In the case of the Fact Crashing(TM) Methodology, the prioritization of structured data can provide a significant procedural, tactical, and even strategic advantage - including the repeated experience of speeding up dispute resolution by providing both parties with quicker access to mutually agreeable (or mutually obvious) facts. These principles provide the missing tools that will change the way we litigate and summarize decades of experience learning how to identify, qualify, prioritize, and apply structured data to the benefit of resolving disputes, predominately in a legal setting.