What remains of Guevara?

Throughout the book''s various chapters and stations, the author is careful to present Guevara and his thought with a great deal of objectivity. He is equally careful not to pass judgment on the success or failure of his ideas and positions, leaving history to have the final say.The author, Dr. Mas''ad Arabeed, emphasizes that writing about Guevara and other pioneers of revolution and change in human history cannot be neutral, nor can it be a historical narrative or a cold academic study devoid of the author''s own position and engagement. On the contrary, the writer cannot avoid political, ideological, and moral evaluation as long as the subject of the writing is the revolutionary''s struggle to change individuals, society, and even the reality and future of humanity.From this perspective, writing is, in essence, a bias toward the truth. It is no longer possible to hide behind neutrality; rather, a decisive and clear stand with revolutionary thought is required.